Does the Inter-American Court behave like an international court? : some reflections about monitoring compliance in the case “Artavia Murillo vs. Costa Rica”

Autores/as

  • Max Silva Abbott
  • Ligia de Jesús Castaldi

Palabras clave:

Corte Interamericana, Artavia, Fecundación in vitro, Sala Constitucional, Medida provisional, Supervisión de cumplimiento, Cosa juzgada, Control de convencionalidad

Resumen

This article describes the monitoring of compliance with the judgment in “Artavia Murillo et al. v/ Costa Rica (‘in vitro fertilization’ case)”, issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2012, where the court ordered Costa Rica to lift its ban on in vitro fertilization and to subsidize it through its Social Security System. In particular, the paper analyzes the Court’s actions in the aftermath of the judgment, in provisional measures, the supervision of compliance hearing and the supervision of compliance resolution in relation to the “Artavia” case, all of which show different substantive and formal irregularities that affect both the case in point as well as the Inter-American System of Human Rights in general. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Biografía del autor/a

Max Silva Abbott

Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad de Navarra. Profesor de Filosofía del Derecho y de Introducción al Derecho de la Facultad de Derecho, Universidad San Sebastián, sede Concepción, Chile

Ligia de Jesús Castaldi

Master of Laws (LL.M.) por Harvard Law School. Profesora de Derecho Internacional y Derechos Humanos, Ave Maria School of Law, Estados Unidos

Descargas

Publicado

2017-05-24

Cómo citar

Silva Abbott, M., & Castaldi, L. de J. (2017). Does the Inter-American Court behave like an international court? : some reflections about monitoring compliance in the case “Artavia Murillo vs. Costa Rica”. Prudentia Iuris, (82), 19–58. Retrieved from https://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/PRUDENTIA/article/view/381

Número

Sección

Parte I. Cátedra Internacional Ley Natural y Persona Humana