Recovering Nussbaum’s Aristotelian Roots
Keywords:
CAPABILITIES, POLITICAL LIBERALISM, ARISTOTLE, MARTHA NUSSBAUM, ETHICSAbstract
The paper examines the relationship between Creating Capabilities and political liberalism. Originally founded on the basis of Aristotelian philosophy, the theory of ‘capabilities’ developed by Nussbaum turns to political liberalism in the mid 90’s. Throughout the article, the principles of both perspectives are depicted and contrasted, focusing on the capacity of affiliation, the concept of common good and the idea of freedom. Severine Deneulin argues that the current reality calls for the capabilities approach to be more rooted in a relational anthropology which the Aristotelian ethical tradition is more akin to. This line can be found in Nussbaum’s first approach to the theory of capabilities, where affiliation as an architectonic capability leads to the common good being the end of political action, and practical reason as an architectonic capability leads to reasoning ordered towards the achievement of the common good, to
the detriment of individualism.
Downloads
References
Alexander, John M. (2010), “Ending the Liberal Hegemony: Republican
Freedom and Amartya Sen’s Theory of Capabilities”, Contemporary Political Theory, 9(1): 5-24.
Blackledge, P. and K. Knight (eds) (2011), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism, University of Notre Dame Press.
Deneulin, Séverine and Townsend, Nicholas (2007), “Public Goods, Global Public Goods and the Common Good”, International Journal of Social Economics, 34(1/2): 19-36. Revista Cultura Económica 37
Hollenbach, David (2002), The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Keys, Mary M. (2006), Aquinas, Aristotle and the Promise of the Common Good. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
MacIntyre, Alasdair (2011a), “How Aristotelianism can become
revolutionary: Ethics, resistance and utopia”, in P. Blackledge and K. Knight (eds), Virtue and Politics, University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, Alasdair (2011b), “Where we were, where we are, and where we need to be”, in P. Blackledge and K. Knight (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism, University of Notre Dame Press.
Nussbaum, Martha (1988), “Nature, Function and Capability: Aristotle on
Political Distribution”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume: 145-184.
Nussbaum, Martha (1990a), “Aristotelian Social Democracy”, in B. Douglass et al. (Eds) Liberalism and the Good. Routledge: 203-252, London.
Nussbaum, Martha (1990b), “The Discernement of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality”, in M. Nussbaum, Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press: 54–104.
Nussbaum, Martha (1992), “Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism”, Political Theory, 20: 202-246.
Nussbaum, Martha (1999), “Virtue Ethics: A Misleading Category?”, The Journal of Ethics, 3(3): 163-201.
Nussbaum, Martha (2010), Not For Profit: Why Democracy Needs
the Humanities, Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha (2011), Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Nussbaum, Martha (2011b), “Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39(1): 3-45.
Robinson, A. and S. Tormey (2009), “Resisting «Global Justice»: Disrupting the Colonial «Emancipatory» Logic of the West”, Third World Quarterly, 30(8): 1395-1409.
Sandel, Michael (2009), Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? Allen Lane, London.
Sen, Amartya (1992), Inequality Re-Examined, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Tyler, Colin (2006), “Contesting the Common Good. T.H. Green and
Contemporary Republicanism”, in M. Dimova-Cookson and W. J. Mander (eds), TH Green: Ethics, Metaphysics and Political Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Wolff, Jonathan and De-Sahlit, Avner (2007), Disadvantage. Oxford University Press, New-York.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License