Explorando el núcleo del significado de los conceptos. Incidencia de las variables psicolingüísticas en una tarea de reconocimiento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46553/RPSI.17.33.2021.p61-80Palabras clave:
Núcleo del significado, Memoria semántica, Variables psicolingüísticas, Edad de AdquisiciónResumen
Aún no existe precisión acerca de cuál es la relación entre las variables psicolingüísticas y el núcleo del significado conceptual. Este trabajo explora la relación de la Edad de Adquisición, la Imaginabilidad, la Riqueza semántica, la Familiaridad y la Concretud en la constitución del núcleo del significado. Se utiliza una tarea de reconocimiento con claves, construida con 120 conceptos y sus primeros 5 atributos extraídos de las Normas de Atributos Semánticos en Español. Participaron 300 estudiantes que debieron recuperar, en una combinatoria de 5 tomados de a 3, la etiqueta verbal del concepto al que tales atributos definen. Los mejores predictores fueron la EdA y la imaginabilidad. Estos resultados son consistentes con los estudios que sugieren la EdA como la variable que mejor explica el desempeño en tareas de Decisión Léxica.
Descargas
Citas
Álvarez, B. y Cuetos, F. (2007). Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish. BRM 39, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193006
Amsel, B. D., & Cree, G. S. (2013). Semantic richness, concreteness, and object domain: An electrophysiological study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 67(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029807
Barca, L. Burani, C. y Arduino, L.S (2002) Word naming times and Psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. BRMI&C 34, 424-434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195471
Barsalou, L.W. (2009) Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 364, 1281-1289. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149
Barsalou, L. (2008) Grounded Cognition. Annu. Rev. Psy. (59), 617–645.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Barsalou, L. (2003) Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18:5-6, 513-562.https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000026
Bargetto Fernández, M. A. y Riffo Ocares, B. (2019). El reconocimiento de palabras y el acceso léxico: revisión de modelos y pruebas experimentales. Boletín de filología, 54(1), 341-361. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-93032019000100341
Borghesani, V. y Piazza, M. (2017). The neuro cognitive representations of symbols: The case of concrete words. Neuropsychologia, 105, 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.026
Brysbaert, M. y Ellis, A. (2016) Aphasia and age of acquisition: are early-learned words more resilient? Aphasia, Frequency and Language Processing 11 (30). https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1106439
Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I. y De Dayne, S. (2000) Age of acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104 (4), 215-216.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00021-4
Buchanan, E., Valentine, K. y Maxwell, N. (2019). English semantic feature production norms: An extended database of 4436 concepts. BRM 51, 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01243-z
Buchanan, E., Holmes, J., Teasley, M. y Hutchison, K. (2012). English semantic wordpair norms and a searchable Web portal for experimental stimulus creation. BRM, 45(3), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0284-z
Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B. y Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000266
Carroll, J. y White, M. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture naming latency. Quart JEP 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747308400325
Collins, A. y Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. y Álvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. BRM&C 31, 650-658. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200741
Davis, C. J. y Perea, M. (2005) BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods. 37, 665-671. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192738
Deng, Y., Wang, Y., Qiu, Ch., Hu, Z., Sun, W., Gong, Y., Zhao, X. He, W., y Cao, L. (2021) A Chinese Conceptual Semantic Feature Dataset (CCFD). BRM (preprint). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01525-x
De Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Dry, M. J., Voorspoels, W. y Storms, G. (2008). Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for concepts. BRM 40, 1030–1048. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1030
Devereux, B., Tyler, L., Geertzen, J. y Randall, B. (2014). The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain (CSLB) concept property norms. BRM 46, 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0420-4
Dewhurst, S. A., Hitch, G. J. y Barry, C. (1998). Separate effects of word frequency and age of acquisition in recognition and recall. JEP: LM&C 24(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.284
Dubossarsky, H., De Deyne, S. y Hills, T. (2017). Quantifying the structure of free association networks across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 53(8),1560–1570. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000347
Ellis, A. y Lambon Ralph, M. (2000). Age of Acquisition Effects in Adult Lexical Processing Reflect Loss of Plasticity in Maturing Systems: Insights from Connectionist Networks. JEP: LM&C 26(2), 1103-1123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1103
Elsherif, M., Catling, J. y Frisson, S. (2020). Two words as one: A multi-naming investigation of the age-of-acquisition effect in compound-word processing. Memory and Cognition 48, 511–525. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00986-6
Fernández-Coello, A., Havas, V., Juncadella, M., Sierpowska, J., Rodríguez-Fornells, A. y Gabarrós A. (2017). Age of language acquisition and cortical language organization in multilingual patients undergoing awake brain mapping. Journal of Neurosurgery 126(6):1912-1923. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.5.JNS152791
García Coni, A., Comesaña, A., Piccolo, B. y Vivas, J. (2020). Relaciones conceptuales: Comparación entre niños, adultos jóvenes y adultos mayores. RIP, 13 (1), 59-69. https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/1617
Gardiner, J., Gregg, V. y Hampton, J. (1988). Word frequency and generation effects. JEP: L, M, and C, 14(4), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.687
Gilhooly, K. y Gilhooly, M. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks. Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197541
Gilhooly, K. & Logie, R. (1980) Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1944 words. Behavior Research methods 12(4). 395-427 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201693
González-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J. y Cuetos, F. (2014). Effects of the psycholinguistic variables on the lexical decision task in Spanish: A study with 2,765 words. BRM 46, 517–525. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0383-5
González-Nosti, M. y Cuetos, F. (2009) Influencia de las variables psicolingüísticas sobre el efecto de generación. Psicológica, 30(2): 323-342. https://www.uv.es/psicologica/articulos2.09/10GONZALEZ.pdf
Hernández Muñoz, N. (2014). Categorías en el léxico bilingüe: perspectivas desde el priming semántico y la disponibilidad léxica. RAEL (13) 1, 19-38. Gale Academic OneFile.
Juhasz B, Yap M, Raoul A, Kaye M. (2018). A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of muñofrequency trajectory. JEP: LM&C 45(1):82-96.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000564
Kivisaari, S., van Vliet, M., Hultén, A., Lindh-Knuutila, T., Faisal, A. y Salmelin, R. (2019). Reconstructing meaning from bits of information. Nature Communications 10, 927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08848-0
Kremer, G., Baroni, M. (2011). A set of semantic norms for German and Italian. BRM 43, 97–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0028-x
Lenci, A., Baroni, M., Cazzolli, G. y Marotta G. (2013). BLIND: a set of semantic feature norms from the congenitally blind. BRM 45(4):1218-33. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0323-4
Manoiloff, L., Artstein, M., Canavoso, M., Fernández, L. y Segui, J. (2010) Expanded norms for 400 experimental pictures in an Argentinean Spanish-speaking population. BRM 42(2):452–460. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.452
Martínez-Cuitiño, M., Soriano, F., Formoso, J., Borovinsky, G., Ferrari, J., Pontello, N., Barreyro, J.P. y Manes, F. (2018). Procesamiento semántico de conceptos concretos y abstractos en Afasia Progresiva Primaria-variante semántica. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia 8(1) 2018: 63-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/RLOG.59530
McRae, K. y Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic Semantic Similarity Priming. JEP: L, M, and C (24) 3, 558-572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.558
McRae, K., Cree, G., Seidenberg, M. y McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. BRM, 37(4), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192726
Moldovan, C., Ferré, P., Demestre, J. y Sánchez-Casas, R. (2015). Semantic similarity: normative ratings for 185 Spanish noun triplets. BRM 47(3), 788-799. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0501-z
Montefinese, M., Ambrosini, E., Fairfield, B. y Mammarella, N. (2014). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian. BRM, 46(3), 887-903. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0405-3
Morrison, C. M., y Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. JEP: L, M, and C, 21(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.116
O'Craven K. y Kanwisher N. (2000). Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12(6):1013-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137549
Pexman, P., Hargreaves, I., Siakaluk, P. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 161–167. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.161
Ruts, W., De Deyne, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T. y Storms, G. (2004). Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars. BRM&C 36(3), 506-515. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195597
Sartori, G., Lombardi, L. y Mattiuzzi, L. (2005). Semantic relevance best predicts normal and abnormal name retrieval. Neuropsychologia, 43(5), 754 –770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.001
Sartori, G., & Lombardi, L. (2004). Semantic relevance and semantic disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 439-452. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.028
Sartori, G., Polezzi, D., Mameli, F. y Lombardi, L. (2005). Feature type effects in semantic memory: an event related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters, 390. 139-144. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.015
Smith, E., Shoben, E., y Rips, L. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psyc Rev 81(3), 214-241. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036351
Snodgrass, J. y Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. BRMI&C 28(4),516–536.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200540
Stein, L. y de Azevedo Gomes, C. F. (2009). Normas brasileiras para listas de palavras associadas: associação semântica, concretude, frequência e emocionalidade. Teor. e Pesq. (25) 537-546. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-37722009000400009
Van Loon-Vervoorn A. y Van Der Koppen M.(1988). The Importance of Age of Word Acquisition for Imageability in Word Processing. In: Denis M., Engelkamp J., Richardson J.T.E. (eds) Cognitive and Neuropsychological Approaches to Mental Imagery. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1391-2_9.
Vinson, D.P. Vigliocco, G. (2008) Semantic feature production norms for a large set of concepts of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods (40) 183-190.
Vivas, J., Kogan, B., Romanelli, S., Lizarralde, F. y Corda, L. (2020). A cross-linguistic comparison of Spanish and English semantic norms: Looking at core features. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(2), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000523
Vivas, J., Kogan, B., Yerro, M., Romanelli, S. y Vivas, L. (2021). Levels in the structure of concepts. Describing the structure of concepts through different feature levels. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Taylor & Francis ISSN: 2044592X. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.1858840
Vivas, J., Martínez, S., Krzemien, D. y Lizarralde, F. (2020). Estabilidad semántica en la producción de atributos semánticos entre adultos mayores y adultos jóvenes. APL 38(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.7368
Vivas, J. Vivas, L. y MacIntyre, M. (2017) Tipología de atributos ponderada en base a Normas de Atributos Semánticos. Trends in Psychology (25) 2, 843-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.9788/TP2017.2-21Es
Vivas, J., Vivas, L., Comesaña, A., García Coni, A. y Vorano, A. (2017). Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts. BRM, 49, 3, 1095–1106. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0777-2
Vivas, L. Manoiloff, L. Garcia, A. Lizarralde, F. y Vivas, J. (2019). Core semantic links or lexical associations: Assessing the nature of responses Word Association Tasks. Journal of psycholinguistic research 48(2), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9601-8
Vivas, L., Montefinese, M., Bolognesi, M. y Vivas, J. (2020). Core features: measures and characterization for different languages. Cognitive Processing - International Quarterly of Cognitive Science. Special Topic. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10339-020-00969-5This article is part of the Special Topic on ‘Eliciting Semantic Properties: Methods and Applications’ guest-edited by E. Canessa, S. Chaigneau, B. Devereux, and A. Lenci. Guest editor: Alessandro Lenci (University of Pisa).
Watkins, M. y Gardiner, J. (1979). An appreciation of generate–recognize theory of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 687-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90397-9
Wulff, D., de Deyne, S., Jones, M. y Mata, R. (2019). New perspectives on the aging lexicón. Trends in cognitive sciences, 23(8), 686-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.003
Yap, M., Tan, S., Pexman, P. y Hargreaves I. (2011). Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification. Psych Bull Rev 18, 742–750. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y
Zapico, G. y Vivas, J. (2015). La sinonimia desde una perspectiva lingüístico-cognitiva. Medición de la distancia semántica, Onomázein. Revista de Lingüística, Filología y Traducción 32, 198-211. http://www.onomazein.net/04_NumeroDescarga/n32/PantallaDescarga_32-11.html
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
