Critic review of the postulates of whole language and psicogenesis in writing

Authors

  • Ana María Borzone Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Psicología Matemática y Experimental
  • Magdalena Lacunza Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Canónigo Guido de Andreis e Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Nº 97

Keywords:

Teaching problems, Learning, Reading, Writing

Abstract

Most of the reading teaching programs implemented in our country during the last three decades follow the assertions of Whole Language (Goodman, 1967) and Psychogenesis (Ferreiro & Teberosky, 1979) advocate. These perspectives reject the explicit teaching of spelling-sound relationships and the development of phonological awareness since they postulate that words are read by its global form. Furthermore, practice for getting reading fluency is belittled, as it is considered to be behavioral, and the only comprehension strategy put forward is to advance and guess the feasible textual information. The present work aims to make a critical analysis of the whole language and psychogenesis assumptions taking into account the theoretical and empirical contributions about reading and writing processes made by Cognitive Psychology and Neurosciences researchers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

04/11/2018

How to Cite

Borzone, A. M., & Lacunza, M. (2018). Critic review of the postulates of whole language and psicogenesis in writing. Revista De Psicología, 13(26), 29–43. Retrieved from https://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/RPSI/article/view/1051

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)