Dos visiones distintas de la racionalidad en economía
Resumen
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Allais, Maurice (1953). “Le comportment de l´homme rationel devant le risque: a critique des postulats et axiomes de l´ecole americaine”, en Econometrica, 21 (4): 503-543.
Bicchieri, Christina (1988). “Two Kinds of Racionality” en De Marchi, Neil (ed.), The Popperian legacy in economics: papers presented at a symposium in Amsterdam. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cudd, Ann E. (1993). “Game Theory and the History of Ideas about Rationality,” en Economics and Philosophy, 9:101133.
Giocoli, Nicola (2003). Modeling Rational Agents. From Interwar Economics to Early Modern Game Theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Hollis, Martin (1985). “The emperor’s newest clothes”, en Economics and Philosophy, 1:128-133.
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1999). Dependent Rationals Animals. Carus Publishing Company, Chicago.
Mirowski, Philip (2002). Machine Dreams Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sen, Amartya (1976). “Rational fools: a critique of the behavioralist foundations of economic theory,” en Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6:317-44.
Taylor, Charles (1990). “Rationality,” en Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven (eds). Rationality and relativism. Blackwell, Oxford
Enlaces de Referencia
- Por el momento, no existen enlaces de referencia

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.