Parliamentary sovereignty and prorogation of parliament : a fundamental decision of the Supreme court of the United Kingdom
Keywords:
Judicial control, Prorogation, United Kingdom, BrexitAbstract
The prorogation of Parliament is just a political matter or an issue liable to judicial review? This paper deals with Parliamentary Sovereignty as a fundamental pillar of the unwritten United Kingdom constitution and the limitations of a Royal Prerogative in a Supreme Court fundamental decision.Downloads
References
Bandieri, Luis M., “El entierro de Montesquieu”. Pervivencia del Rule of Law en épocas neoconstitucionales”, FORUM 02, Buenos Aires, EDUCA,
Universidad Católica Argentina, 2014, pp. 75-100.
Bianchi, Alberto B., “Un fallo ejemplar de la Corte Suprema del Reino Unido”, Buenos Aires, elDial.com Biblioteca Jurídica Online, Nº 5317, 2019.
Bianchi, Alberto B., “Un fallo ejemplar de la Corte Suprema del Reino Unido”, El Derecho Administrativo [2019], 1/11/2019, Nº 14.746.
Caird Simson, Jack, “The Supreme Court and Parliament: The Constitutional Status of Checks and Balances”, publicado el 1º de octubre de 2019, rescatado de: https://binghamcentre.biicl.org/comments/65/the-supreme-court-and-parliament-the-constitutional-status-of-checks-andbalances (consultado el 30/3/2020).
Craig, Paul, “The Supreme Court, Prorogation and Constitutional Principle”, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 57/2019.
Dindjer, H., “Prorogation as a Breach of Parliamentary Sovereignty”, U.K.
Const. L. Blog (16 de septiembre 2019), rescatado de: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/09/16/hasan-dindjer-prorogation-as-a-breach-of-parliamentary-sovereignty/ (consultado el 24/3/2020).
Ekins, Richard, “Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Politics of Prorogation”, Policy Exchange, 16 de septiembre de 2019, rescatado de: policyexchange.org.uk/publication/parliamentary-sovereignty-and-the-politics-of-prorogation/ (consultado el 30/3/2020).
Ewing, Keith, “Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty” - The Modern Law
Review @ 2017. The Modern Law Review Limited, 2017, 80(4) MLR 685–
Finnis, John, “The unconstitutionality of the Supreme Court’s prorogation
judgment, with supplementary notes”, American Journal of Jurisprudence 59, 2014, University of Oxford Research Paper Number 6/2020 Notre Dame Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 200304.
Grace, Jamie, “A judgment on the unlawful prorogation of Parliament” (6 de noviembre de 2019), disponible en SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/
ssrn.3481673 (consultado el 24/3/2020).
Hogarth, Raphael, “The Supreme Court has fortified Parliament’s ‘constitutional role’ - and its own”, Institute for Government, www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/supreme-court-fortified-parliaments-constitutional-role-and-its-own (consultado el 5/5/2020).
Howarth, David, “Westminster versus Whitehall: Two Incompatible Views
of the Constitution”, U.K. Const. L. Blog (10th Apr. 2019) https://uk
constitutionallaw.org/2019/04/10/david-howarth-westminster-versus-whitehall-two-incompatible-views-of-the-constitution/ (consultado el 20/11/2019).
Maino, Carlos A. G., “¿Gobierno de los Jueces o Gobierno de las Instituciones? Pervivencia del Rule of Law en épocas neoconstitucionales”, FORUM 02, Buenos Aires, EDUCA, Universidad Católica Argentina, 2014, pp. 113-129.
Mcharg, Aileen, “The Supreme Court’s Prorogation Judgment: Guardian of the Constitution or Architect of the Constitution?”, The Edinburgh Law
Review, Vol 24, Edinburgh University Presss, enero 2020, pp. 95-103.
Sagüés, Néstor P., Teoría de la Constitución, Buenos Aires, Astrea, 2004.
Silva, Teresa D., “Las relaciones entre Escocia e Inglaterra en el camino hacia el brexit”, El Derecho Constitucional 2016-657.
Sobre funcionamiento y aplicación de normas en el Reino Unido, se consultó el sitio web del Parlamento: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/understanding-legislation (consultado el 5/5/2020).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
