The laesio in the uruguayan civil law : different doctrines about their admissibility

Autores/as

  • Valeria Techera Barreiro

Palabras clave:

Lesión, Autonomía de la voluntad, Libertad contractual, Buena fe, Principio de igualdad

Resumen

Despite the similar origin and ideology of Uruguayan and Argentinean Civil Codes and that both legislators clearly rejected the laesio, the evolution of the same in these countries has been very different. While in Argentina the application of the laesio has been admitted since 1940 and expressly regulated in 1968, in Uruguay the discussions about its admissibility continues and the majority doctrine considers that the laesio is not applicable under the Uruguayan legal framework in force

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Biografía del autor/a

Valeria Techera Barreiro

Profesora Ayudante de Derecho Civil en la Universidad Católica del Uruguay. Doctoranda de la Universidad Católica Argentina. Doctorado en Ciencias Jurídicas

Descargas

Publicado

2017-05-24

Cómo citar

Techera Barreiro, V. (2017). The laesio in the uruguayan civil law : different doctrines about their admissibility. Prudentia Iuris, (82), 165–186. Retrieved from https://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/PRUDENTIA/article/view/388

Número

Sección

Parte II. Estudios Doctrinales