PHRÓNESIS EN FEDÓN Y PROTRÉPTICO

Authors

  • María Gabriela Casnati UBA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46553/sty.30.30.2021.p81-100

Keywords:

Phaedo – Protreptic – Phrónesis – Philosophy.

Abstract

Beyond the open discussion about whether there is a Platonic or Academic period in Aristotle and, even, whether the Protrepticus can be included within it, in this paper we intend to highlight the interesting point –although not so often examined– of the narrow relationship between the treatment of phrónesis in the Phaedo and in the Protrepticus. In order to do so, we will start from the analysis of the concept of phrónesis in the Phaedo, where we find a double approach to the term that represents both the most desirable end to be achieved as well as that practical wisdom that allows us to adequately evaluate certain situations in life. Next, we will return to this double platonic aspect of phrónesis as a means and as an end of the good life in some selected fragments of the Protrepticus to show how Aristotle adheres to the Platonic anthropological conception in terms of a guiding soul that subdues the body and whose most excellent function must be the center or télos of human life. We find that phrónesis, in addition to allowing men to philosophize and achieve contemplation and knowledge, also exhibits a practical dimension as the foundation of the proper use of the body to live in the best possible way.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERTI, E. La filosofia del “primo” Aristotele, Milano: Centro di Richer-che di Metafisica dell’ Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 1997.

BERTI, E. Aristotele Protreptico: Esortazione alla filosofía, Turín: UTET, 2014.

CASERTANO, G. Fedone, o dell'anima. Drama etico in tre atti, trad., commento e noti di---, Napoli: Lofreddo, 2015.

DÜRING, I. “Aristotle in the Protrepticus”, 81-98. En: L. de Raeymaeker and A. Mansion (eds), Autour d’ Aristote, Louvain: Publ. Univer-sitaires, 1955.

DÜRING, I. Aristotle’s Protrepticus An Attempt at Reconstruction, Göte-borg: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1961.

GOOCH, P. W. “The relation between wisdom and virtue in Phaedo 69a6-c3”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 1974 12: 153-159.

JAEGER, W. Aristóteles, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1992.

LUCE, J. V. “A discussion of Phaedo 69a6-c2”, Classical Quarterly 1944 38: 60-64.

MEGINO RODRÍGUEZ, C. Protréptico, introducción, traducción y notas de---, Madrid: Abada, 2006.

PALLÍ BONET, J., ARISTÓTELES, Ética Nicomáquea – Ética Eudemia, in-trod., trad. y notas de---, Madrid: Gredos, 1993.

ROWE, C. J., PLATO, Phaedo, incl. bibliography and index, Cambridge: University Press, 1993.

SEGGIARO, C. La concepción de filosofía en el Protréptico de Aristóteles. Su posible influencia platónica, Buenos Aires: TeseoPress, 2019.

VALLEJO CAMPOS, A., ARISTÓTELES, Fragmentos, introd., trad. y notas, Madrid: Gredos, 2005.

VIGO, A., PLATÓN, Fedón, trad., notas e introd. de---, Buenos Aires: Co-lihue, 2009.

WHITE, D. Myth and Metaphysics in Plato’s Phaedo, London and To-ronto: Associated University Presses, 1989.

WILLIAMSON, H. The Phaedo of Plato, London: MacMillan, 1904.

Published

12/30/2021

How to Cite

Casnati, M. G. (2021). PHRÓNESIS EN FEDÓN Y PROTRÉPTICO. Stylos, 30(30), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.46553/sty.30.30.2021.p81-100

Issue

Section

Artículos