Paul Ricoeur and the problem of philosophical anthropology. The debate with Heidegger over Kant's appropriation in "Fallible man"

Abstract

This article aims to demonstrate that, under the transcendental stage of the anthropology of ‘The fallible man’, Ricoeur develops a discussion with the philosophies of finitude, to achieve an original interpretation of Kant, crystallized, in turn, in a debate with Heidegger. To demonstrate this, we will dedicate ourselves, first of all, to develop the main concepts of the transcendental stage of reflection such as the Ricoeur proponents. Then, we will try to see how and to what extent they confront the Heideggerian proposal. With this, we intend to highlight the methodical and thematic differences present in the phenomenological-hermeneutical projects of both philosophers.