Merleau-Ponty against the project of a universal grammar: logic and language

Authors

  • Claudio Cormick Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46553/tab.24.2024.p60-80

Keywords:

Merleau-Ponty, Universal Grammar, Language, Logic

Abstract

Throughout a variety of texts, Merleau-Ponty criticized the Husserlian project which he alternatively called a “universal grammar” and an “eidetics of language”, and to which he associated a series of consequences: the claim that universal grammar entails (I) the prior knowability of universal “forms” with respect to natural languages; (II) the univocity with which words in natural languages would be related to their meanings, and the transparency which this univocal relation would present to consciousness; (III) the secondariness of language with respect to thought, and (IV) universal intertranslatability. The French author rejects these consequences and therefore questions the plausibility of the universalistic project in question. However, it is not clear that these alleged consequences are actually entailed by the proposal Merleau-Ponty is discussing, or that, if obtained, they take the specific form necessary for the criticism to succeed. We will try to show that such a criticism ultimately fails.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Claudio Cormick, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Argentina

Claudio Cormick es doctor en Filosofía (UBA/Paris 8), investigador asistente en CONICET y docente en la carrera de Filosofía de la UBA. Es autor de 39 artículos en castellano, inglés y francés en revistas especializadas (incluyendo Chiasmi, Science and Education, Manuscrito, Daimon y Análisis Filosófico) y de dos libros, el segundo en coautoría con Valeria Edelsztein, junto a quien publica mensualmente una columna de ciencia y epistemología en el diario Tiempo Argentino. Investiga en la actualidad temas de epistemología social desde una perspectiva interdisciplinar, en particular la problemática del negacionismo científico.

References

Edie, J. (1970a). Can Grammar Be Thought? In J. Edie, F. H. Parker, & C. O. Schrag (Eds.), Patterns of the Life-World: Essays in Honor of John Wild. Northwestern University Press. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=59A6873D0F4FFDDD99F10528CAEDC5D4

Edie, J. (1970b). The Levels and Objectivity of Meaning. In R. Wood (Ed.), The Future of metaphysics. Chicago, Quadrangle Books. http://archive.org/details/futureofmetaphys0000unse

Edie, J. (1976). Speaking and meaning: The phenomenology of language. Bloomington : Indiana University Press. http://archive.org/details/speakingmeaningp0000edie

Edie, J. (1987). Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy of language: Structuralism and dialectics. https://philpapers.org/rec/EDIMPO

Escribano, X. (2000). Gesto y palabra: La esencia emocional del lenguaje según Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Thémata: Revista de filosofía, 25, 175–185.

Foultier, A. P. (2013). Merleau-Ponty’s Encounter with Saussure’s Linguistics: Misreading, Reinterpretation or Prolongation? Chiasmi International, 15, 129–150. https://doi.org/10.5840/chiasmi20131514

Haysom, K. (2009). Communicating Depth: Habermas and Merleau-Ponty on Language and Praxis. Political Theory, 37(5), 649–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709340136

Husserl, E. (1913). Logische Untersuchungen Bd. II. Max Niemeyer.

Kee, H. (2018). Phenomenology and Ontology of Language and Expression: Merleau-Ponty on Speaking and Spoken Speech. Human Studies, 41(3), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-018-9456-x

Kwant, R. C. (1963). The Phenomenological Philosophy of Merleau-Ponty (First Edition). Duquesne University Press.

Landes, D. (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the paradoxes of expression.

Lewis, P. E. (1966). Merleau-Ponty and the Phenomenology of Language. Yale French Studies, 36/37, 19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2930398

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Editions Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1951). Le Philosophe et la Sociologie. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, 10, 50–69. JSTOR.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a). Phenomenology and the Sciences of Man. In J. M. Edie (Ed.), The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, USA: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). Psychosociologie de l’enfant. Bulletin de psychologie, 18(236), 203–225.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). The prose of the world. Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1975). Les Sciences de l’homme et la phénoménologie. Centre de documentation universitaire.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1978). La prose du monde. (Original work published 1969)

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1978a). On the phenomenology of language. In M. Merleau-Ponty, Signs (6. print). Northwestern Univ. Pr.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1978b). The philosopher and sociology. In M. Merleau-Ponty, Signs (6. print). Northwestern Univ. Pr.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception. Taylor & Francis.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2020). Le problème de la parole: Cours au collège de France. Notes, 1953-1954 (1er édition). Métis Presses.

Priest, S. (1998). Merleau-Ponty. Routledge. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=166627

Roux, J.-M. (2016). Forme du perçu, structure du langage: Merleau-Ponty avec et contre Saussure. Bulletin d’Analyse Phénoménologique. https://doi.org/10.25518/1782-2041.822

Vendryes, J. (1921). Le langage: Introduction linguistique à l’histoire. Paris : Renaissance du livre.

Yahata, K. (2012). La problématique de l’expression dans la philosophie de Maurice Merleau-Ponty.

Published

07/16/2024

How to Cite

Cormick, C. (2024). Merleau-Ponty against the project of a universal grammar: logic and language. Tábano, (24), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.46553/tab.24.2024.p60-80

Issue

Section

Articles