Knowing Singular Plural. University, Humanities, and the Interdisciplinary Nature of Knowledge

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46553/tab.25.2025.e12

Keywords:

University, Interdisciplinarity, Humanities, Plurality, System of Knowledge

Abstract

University is the place where every discipline is acknowledged as a participant in the process of knowledge. Its “border” nature, however, makes the University a conflictive territory in between national economic and political interests and its calling to a universal search for truth. This conflict expresses itself in the double purpose of preparing professionals for the job market and of preparing the grounds for a system of knowledge. However, since University depends on economic and political interests, the logic of division of labor is transposed into the space of knowledge and produces a disciplinary specialization that loses any possibility of a system of knowledge. Interdisciplinary work is seen today as a way to heal this fracture within science, in the supposition that interdisciplinarity is something to be gained. However, in this essay, I argue that interdisciplinarity is the very nature of every discipline. Disciplines are not closed and self-sufficient totalities, but the result of an interaction between all discourses. The notion of singular plural knowledge expresses this relational nature of knowledge. Humanities help to stress this common belonging of every discourse in a number of ways: they root every discourse in the lived human experience, they also emphasize the symbolic articulation of every discipline, and, finally, they make it clear that every knowledge has a pragmatic motivation. In this way, they also invite every discourse to acknowledge itself as a contingent expression within a certain historical system of knowledge. University should, then, be seen as cenobium, a space in which all disciplines are congregated, and where the relational life of discourses can flourish.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Martín Grassi, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Argentina; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Argentina

Profesor y Licenciado en Filosofía (UCA). Doctor en Filosofía (UBA). Investigador Adjunto del CONICET en la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la UCA. Profesor de Antropología Filosófica y de Teología Filosófica (UCA). Fue investigador Post-doctoral de la Fundación Alexander von Humboldt en el Instituto de Hermenéutica (Universidad de Bonn) y en el Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas y Filosóficas (Universidad Paris I, Sorbonne-Panthéon) (2018-2020). Fue también investigador post-doctoral de la Universidad de Oxford y de la Fundación John Templeton en el Centro Ian Ramsey para Ciencia y Religión (Universidad de Oxford) (2016). Autor de los libros: Ignorare Aude! (2012); (Im)posibilidad y (sin)razón (2014); La comunidad demorada (2017); El dios de los ladrones (2021); Una historia crítica de la idea de vida (2022); Phármakon (2023); La metafísica del nosotros de Gabriel Marcel (2024); The Ghost of Totalitarianism (2024). Áreas de interés: Teología Política, Metafísica, Antropología, Psicología, Sociología, Filosofía de la Religión.

Published

12/23/2024

How to Cite

Grassi, M. (2024). Knowing Singular Plural. University, Humanities, and the Interdisciplinary Nature of Knowledge. Tábano, (25), e12. https://doi.org/10.46553/tab.25.2025.e12

Issue

Section

Are the humanities (in)useful in the 21st century?