Should the allegedly called animal rights be taken seriously? : an analysis based on the approach of Martha Nussbaum

Authors

  • José Chávez Fernández Postigo Universidad Católica San Pablo ; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica

Keywords:

Animal rights, Nussbaum, Dignity, Justice, Iusnaturalism

Abstract

This work starts from the premise that it is difficult for iusnaturalism to take seriously the arguments about the animal rights and that this is, partly, due to its understanding of man, law and justice. It will be explored the possibility that this approach may result insufficient to take care of the ethical-juridical problematic that the contemporary man perceives - increasingly and with great interest - under the topic “animal rights”. The subject will be analyzed, based on the contributions of Martha Nussbaum, a model that appears as overrun of both the animalist approaches, as well as the ecologists. There is an exposition of these models, followed by the Nussbaum approach and its extension to the topic under discussion, finally a critical evaluation of their contributions, especially of the Notions of dignity and justice underlying it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

21-12-2017

How to Cite

Chávez Fernández Postigo, J. (2017). Should the allegedly called animal rights be taken seriously? : an analysis based on the approach of Martha Nussbaum. Prudentia Iuris, (83), 149–167. Retrieved from https://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/PRUDENTIA/article/view/976

Issue

Section

Parte II. Estudios Doctrinales