COVID-19 IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION. A LEGAL ANSWER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.92.2021.pp.65-96Palavras-chave:
COVID-19, Arbitration, Investment Law, Case Law, Arbitral Tribunals, Police Power, Indirect ExpropriationResumo
During today’s situation of COVID-19, States take emergency measures which will be subject to investment arbitration claims sooner or later. The aim of this paper is to provide a possible solution to such cases where the State’s and the investor’s interests compete with each other. By analysing cases from the 21th century and applying my findings to hypothetical COVID-19 cases, a general answer on how to solve COVID-19 related investment disputes shall be given.
Downloads
Referências
Black, C. H. (1990). Black’s Law Dictionary. 6th ed. St. Paul. West Publishing Co.
Blankenburg, G. J. (2009). “The Global Financial Crisis”. Cambridge Journal of Economics
(4).
Bonnitcha, J. (2004). Substantive Protection Under Investment Treaties: A Legal and
Economic Analysis. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Bücheler, G. (2015). Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration. Oxford. OUP
Oxford.
Christie, G. (1962). “What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International
Law?”. British Yearbook of International Law 38 (307).
Cox, J. (2019). Expropriation in Investment Treaty Arbitration. New York. Oxford
International Arbitration Series.
Fortier, Y.; Drymer, S.; Ratner, S. (2008). “Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context:
Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law”. American Journal of
International Law 102 (475).
Friedman, S. (1953). Expropriation in International Law. London. Stevens.
Galva, J.; Atchison, C.; Levey, S. (2005). “Public Health Strategy and the Police
Powers of the State”. Public Health Reports 120.
Gross, S. (2002). “Inordinate Chill: BITs, Non-NAFTA MITs and Host-State Regulatory
Freedom - An Indonesian Case Study”. Michigan Journal of International
Law 24.
Herz, J. (1941). “Expropriation of Foreign Property”. American Journal of International
Law 35 (243).
Kaufmann-Kohler, G. (2007). “Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?”. Arbitration
International Law Journal 23 (357).
Legarre, S. (2007). “The Historical Background of the Police Power”. Journal of Constitutional
Law, Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper 9 (1413).
Ranjan, P. (2020). “COVID-19, India And Indirect Expropriation: Is the Police Powers
Doctrine, a Reliable Defence”. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 13 (1).
Tienhaara, K. (2011). “Regulatory chill and the threat of arbitration: A view from
political science”. In: Brown Chester & Miles Kate [ed.]. Evolution in Investment
Treaty Law and Arbitration. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Waelde, T.; Abba, K. (2001). “Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and
Regulatory Taking in International Law”. International and Comparative Law
quarterly 50.
Documents
American Law Institute. (1987). Restatement (Third) Foreign Relations of the United
States 1 (712) comment (g).
Council of the EU. (2012). Approved Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament
and of the Council establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution
of credit institutions and investment firms.
Garcia-Amador F.V. (1959). Special rapporteur, Fourth Report on State Responsibility,
Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission 2 (44).
Harvard Draft Convention on International Responsibility of States. (1961). Art.
(5).
IMF (2020). World Economic Outlook Reports, The Great Lockdown.
IMF (1999). Working Paper, The 1994 Mexican Economic Crisis (1999).
UNCTAD (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trade and development:
transitioning to a new normal.
UNCTAD (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trade and development:
transitioning to a new normal. UNCTAD/OSG/2020/1.
UNCTAD (2020). Investment Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Investment
Policy Monitor Special Issue (4).
UNCTAD (2012). Expropriation, A Sequel. UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2011/7. New York
and Geneva
UNCTAD (2019). Trade and Development Board, Investment, Enterprise and Development
Commission. 11th session. Recent developments in the international
investment regime: Taking stock of phase 2 reform actions (9).
OECD (2017). The Role of Economic Regulators in the Governance of Infrastructure.
OECD (2004). Working Paper on International Investment, Indirect Expropriation
and the Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (5).
World Bank Group (2020). COVID-19 Crisis Response Approach Paper.
Table of Treaties
Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of Burkina
Faso for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (Canada-Burkina Faso
BIT), signed on 30-11-2014, entered into force 11-10-2017.
Agreement between the Government of Cyprus and the Government of Greece for
the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (Cyprus-Greece BIT),
signed on 30-3-1992, entered into force on 26-2-1993.
Agreement on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments between the
United Mexican States and the Kingdom of Spain (Mexico-Spain BIT), signed on
-6-1995, entered into force on 18-12-1996, terminated on 3-4-2008.
Agreement on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments between
the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
(Netherlands-Czech Republic BIT), signed on 29-4-1991.
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of
the Republic of Senegal for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (Senegal-
India BIT), signed on 3-7-2008, entered into force on 17-10-2009.
Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay
OD the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (Switzerland-Uruguay
BIT) signed on 7-10-1988, entered into force on 22-4-1991, entered into
force on 29-4-1992.
EU-Singapore-Free Trade Agreement, signed on 19-10-2018, entered into force on
-2-2019.
ICSID Convention - Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between
States and Nationals of Other States, 575 UNTS 159, signed on 18-3-1965, entered
into force 14-10-1966.
ICSID Additional Facility Rules, ICSID/11/rev. 1, approved on 29-9-2002, entered
into force 1-1-2003.
North American Free Trade Agreement, 32 ILM 289, signed on 17-12-1992, entered
into force 1-1-1994.
UNCITRAL, adopted by the General Assembly on 15 December 1976.
The Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement between the European Union
and the Government of Canada, signed on 30-10-2016, entered into force provisionally
on 21-9-2017.
The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, adopted on 22-5-2001,
entered into force on 17-5-2004.
Treaty Between the Government of Argentina and the Government of the U.S. concerning
the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investments (Argentina-
U.S. BIT), signed on 14-11-1991, entered into force on 20-10-1994.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1155 UNTS 331, signed on 23-5-1969,
entered into force on 27-1-1980.
Table of Cases
Investment Arbitration Cases
Caratube International Oil Company LLP v. Kazakhstan, Saipem S.p.A. v. Bangladesh,
ICSID Case No. ARB/08/12, Decision on Jurisdiction of March 21 2007.
Chemtura Corporation v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award, 2 August
(Chemtura v. Canada).
CME Czech Republic v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September
EDF (Services) Limited v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/13, Award, 8 October
El Paso Energy International Company v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No.
Arb/03/15, Award, 31 October 2011.
Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction,
Applicable Law and Liability, 30 November 2012.
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No.
ARB(AF)/02/1, Award, 17 July 2006 (Fireman’s Fund v. Mexico).
Glamis Gold Ltd v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Award, 8 June 2009.
LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp. and LG&E International Inc. v Argentine
Republic, ICSID Case No. Arb/02/1, Decision on Liability, 3 October 2006 (LG&E
v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Liability).
LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp. and LG&E International, Inc. v. Argentine
Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, Award, 25 July 2007 (LG&E v. Argentine
Republic, Award).
Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v. United States of America, ICSID Case
No. ARB(AF)/98/3, 26 June 2003.
Marfin Investment Group Holdings S.A., Alexandros Bakatselos and Others v. Republic
of Cyprus, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/27, 26 July 2018 (Marfin v. Republic of
Cyprus).
Marvin Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award, 16 December
Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 3 August
(Methanex v. U.S.).
Philip Morris Brands Sàrl and ors v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No.
ARB/10/07, Award, IIC 844 (2016), 28 May 2016 (Philipp Morris v. Uruguay).
Pope & Talbot Inc v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Interim Award, IIC
(2000), 26 June 2000.
Renee Rose Levy de Levi v. The Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/17, Award,
IIC 728 (2014), 26 February 2014.
Quiborax S.A., Non Metallic Minerals S.A. and Allan Fosk Kaplún v. Plurinational
State of Bolivia, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/2, Final Award, 16 September 2015.
Saluka Investments BV v. The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, IIC 210
(2006), 17 March 2006, PCA (Saluka v. The Czech Republic).
S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 11
November 2000.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed S.A. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No.
ARB (AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003 (Tecmed v. Mexico).
Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States, ISCID, Case No ARB(AF)/00/3,
Final Award, 30 April 2004.
International Law Cases
Broniowski v. Poland, ECtHR, Case No. 31443/96, Judgment, 22 June 2005.
James and others v. United Kingdom, ECtHR, Case No. 8793/ /79 (A/98), Judgment,
February 1986.
Matos e Silva, Lda., and Others v. Portugal, ECtHR, Case no. 15777/89, Judgment,
September 1996.
Mellacher and Others v. Austria, ECtHR, Case No. 10522/83; 11011/84; 11070/84,
Judgment, 19 December 1989.
Oscar Chinn affair (U.K. v. Belgium), P.C.I.L., Case No. 63, Judgment, 12 December
Pressos Compañía Naviera and Others v. Belgium, ECtHR, Case no. 17849/91, Judgment,
November 1995.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
