The laesio in the uruguayan civil law : different doctrines about their admissibility

Autores

  • Valeria Techera Barreiro

Palavras-chave:

Lesión, Autonomía de la voluntad, Libertad contractual, Buena fe, Principio de igualdad

Resumo

Despite the similar origin and ideology of Uruguayan and Argentinean Civil Codes and that both legislators clearly rejected the laesio, the evolution of the same in these countries has been very different. While in Argentina the application of the laesio has been admitted since 1940 and expressly regulated in 1968, in Uruguay the discussions about its admissibility continues and the majority doctrine considers that the laesio is not applicable under the Uruguayan legal framework in force

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia Autor

Valeria Techera Barreiro

Profesora Ayudante de Derecho Civil en la Universidad Católica del Uruguay. Doctoranda de la Universidad Católica Argentina. Doctorado en Ciencias Jurídicas

Publicado

2017-05-24

Como Citar

Techera Barreiro, V. (2017). The laesio in the uruguayan civil law : different doctrines about their admissibility. Prudentia Iuris, (82), 165–186. Obtido de https://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/PRUDENTIA/article/view/388

Edição

Secção

Parte II. Estudios Doctrinales