Métricas de la Producción Académica sobre Prudencia, Phronesis y Sabiduría Práctica

Fabio A. Salazar-Piñeros

doi:10.46553/RPSI.20.39.2024.p7-28

Authors

Fabio A. Salazar-Piñeros Universidad Surcolombiana. Profesor Asociado ; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-312X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46553/RPSI.20.39.2024.p7-28

Keywords:

Prudence, Phronesis, Practical Wisdom, Bibliometrics, Scientometrics

Abstract

This paper seeks to identify how the term prudence and its synonyms phronesis and practical wisdom have been handled in academic literature. Information was extracted from Scopus and Web of Science, with the three terms, without time or language limits, and bibliometric and scientometric analyses were carried out using the R package Bibliometrix, with a set of 2,910 records. Two main trends were identified: a philosophical one, with great dispersion but good projection, and another very specialized in the field of economics, with good development but low centrality. Psychology has timid appearances and the consolidation of a line of research in the psychology of prudence is a challenge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fabio A. Salazar-Piñeros, Universidad Surcolombiana. Profesor Asociado ; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina

Universidad Surcolombiana, Profesor Asociado, Programa de Psicología

Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Doctorando en Psicología

References

Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOCB.001

American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5a ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007

Aristóteles. (2001). Ética a Nicómaco (J. L. Calvo Martinez, Trad.). Alianza Editorial. (Traducción de la obra publicada en 1894).

de Aquino, T. (2001). Suma de Teología (4ª ed.). (Regentes de Estudios de las Provincias Dominicanas en España, Trad.) Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos. https://www.dominicos.org/estudio/recurso/suma-teologica/ (Obra original publicada en 1485)

Aubenque, P. (1999). La prudencia en Aristóteles (M. J. Torres Gómez, Trad.). Crítica. (Obra original publicada en 1963).

Babaii, E. & Taase, Y. (2013). Author-assigned keywords in research articles: Where do they come from? Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 1–19. https://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1786-.pdf

Bachmann, C., Habisch, A., & Dierksmeier, C. (2018). Practical Wisdom: Management’s No Longer Forgotten Virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-016-3417-Y

Becker, C. K., Ert, E., Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2020). Experiencing risk: Higher-order risk attitudes in description- and experience-based decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(5), 727–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/XLM0000975

Bhattacharya, O., Chatterjee, A., & Basu, J. (2017). Humility: An Emerging Construct in Moral Psychology. Psychological Studies, 62(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12646-017-0387-9

Bradford, S. C. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects 1934. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000407

Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280

de Caro, M. & Vaccarezza, M. S. (2021). Introduction. En M. De Caro & M. S. Vaccarezza (Eds.), Practical Wisdom. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 1–7). Routledge.

Colasante, A. & Riccetti, L. (2020). Risk aversion, prudence and temperance: It is a matter of gap between moments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 25, 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBEF.2019.100262

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070

Doris, J. M. (2010). Introduction. En J. M. Doris & Moral Psychology Research Group (Eds.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 1–2). Oxford University Press.

van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-009-0146-3

Emmons, R. A. (2007). Thanks!: How the new science of gratitude can make you happier. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Garfield, E. & Sher, I. H. (1993). KeyWords Plus Algorithmic Derivative Indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(5), 298–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199306)44:5<298::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-A

Hariman, R. (2003). Theory without modernity. En R. Hariman (Ed.), Prudence: Classical Virtue, Postmodern Practice (pp. 1–32). Pennsylvania State University Press.

Haslam, N. (1991). Prudence: Aristotelian perspectives on practical reason. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1991.tb00518.x

Haslam, N. & Baron, J. (1994). Intelligence, personality and prudence. En R. J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp. 32–58). Cambridge University Press.

Huang, J. X. (2022). Zeroth, First, and Second Order Prudence Measures. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4033661

Kimball, M. S. (1990). Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica, 58(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938334

Kristjánsson, K., Darnell, C., Fowers, B., Moller, F., Pollard, D., & Thoma, S. (2020). Phronesis: Developing a conceptualisation and an instrument. https://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk//userfiles/jubileecentre/pdf/Research%20Reports/Phronesis_Report.pdf

Kumpulainen, M. & Seppänen, M. (2022). Combining Web of Science and Scopus datasets in citation-based literature study. Scientometrics, 127(10), 5613–5631. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-022-04475-7

Lemmon, K. & Moore, C. (2007). The development of prudence in the face of varying future rewards. Developmental Science, 10(4), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00603.x

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203

Montesinos Castañeda, M. (2019). Relaciones visuales entre la Prudencia y las Virtudes que la componen. Ars Longa, 28, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.7203/ARSLONGA.28.14663

Narvaez, D., Gleason, T., & Mitchell, C. (2010). Moral Virtue and Practical Wisdom: Theme Comprehension in Children, Youth, and Adults. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171(4), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2010.503253

Noel, J. (1999). On the Varieties of Phronesis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.1999.tb00466.x

Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2019). Clasificación estadística internacional de enfermedades y problemas de salud relacionados (11a ed.). https://icd.who.int/

Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues : a handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.

Piñon Gaytan, F. (1999). La Phronesis griega como forma mentis de eticidad. Signos Filosóficos, I(1), 103–114. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/343/34300107.pdf

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/PUBLICATIONS9010012

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.1.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise. A Bibliometric Guide for Researchers. Elsevier.

Seligman, M. E. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.5

Sellés-Dauder, J. F. (1999). La virtud de la prudencia según Tomás de Aquino. Cuadernos de Anuario Filosófico, 90, 1–198. https://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/6095

Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00112

Yang, S., Yuan, Q., & Dong, J. (2020). Are Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics Different? Data Science and Informetrics, 01. https://doi.org/10.4236/DSI.2020.11003

Yi, S. & Choi, J. (2011). The organization of scientific knowledge: the structural characteristics of keyword networks. Scientometrics, 90(3), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-011-0560-1