Incidencia de la Matriz de Creencias Compartidas y la Centralidad Sociocognitiva en la construcción de significados y formación de consensos
Palabras clave:
Redes sociales, Centralidad Sociocognitiva, Matriz de creencias compartidas.Resumen
El modelo de la Muestra de la Información
sostiene que la probabilidad de que cierta información
sea mencionada en un grupo es mayor si se
encuentra disponible en muchos miembros que en
uno solo. La información compartida en la matriz
de creencias preexistente a la interacción social,
tiene mayor probabilidad de ser expresada,
repetida y validada por consentimiento e influye en
el producto grupal.
Objetivos: cuantificar el impacto de la matriz
de creencias compartidas en los procesos de
negociación de significados y comprender cualitativamente
este proceso.
Sujetos: Participaron 225 estudiantes de
Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Mar del
Plata consensuando sobre la relación significativa
entre 9 conceptos académicos.El conocimiento
previo compartido fue operativizado usando la
Centralidad Sociocognitiva. El mapeo de las redes
semánticas de los participantes, su inter influencia
y evolución en las diferentes instancias de la
negociación, el tratamiento analítico de comparación
cuali y cuantitativa y su resolución gráfica,
se realiza por medio de métodos especiales
desarrollados sobre Análisis de Redes Sociales.
Resultados: Las predicciones de influencia social
entre pares y la visualización de la evolución de las
redes semánticas de los participantes y los grupos,
arrojan resultados robustos y sugerentes para su
aplicación a diversos ámbitos de interacción social
y comunicacional.
Descargas
Citas
Alvarez, A. (1894) South America. Buenos Aires:
La Cultura Argentina.
Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D. H, y Naquin, C. (2000).
Group learning in organizations. En M. E.
Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in
theory and research. Hillsdale, N J:
Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Anderson, C. y Lindsay, J. (1998). The
development, perseverance, and change of
naive theories.Social Cognition, 16, (1), 8-
Bajtín, M. (1992) El marxismo y la filosofía del
lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza.
Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive Psychology.
An overview for cognitive scientist.
Hillsdale, N J : Lawrence Erlbaum
Associated.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Language comprehension:
Archival memory or preparation for situated
action? Discourse Processes 28 (1): 61-80
Borgatti, S. (2002).NetDraw.Natick: Analytic
Technologies. V 0.60
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. y Freeman, L.C.
(1999). UCINET 5 for Windows.Software
for Social Network Analysis.Natick:
Analytic Technologies. V 5.2.0.2.
Borgatti, S. y Everett, M. (1996). Mode-2 data set
network analysis. Journal of Computer
Mediated Communication, 2 (1), 12-22.
Bottger, P.C. y Yetton, P.W. (1988) An integration
of process and decisionschemes
explanations of group problem solving
performance. Organizational behavior and
human decision processes, 42, 234-249.
Bueno, S. y Frenck-Mestre, Ch. (2002). Rapid
Activation of the Lexicon: A Further
Investigation with Behavioral and
Computational Results. Brain and
Language, 81,120- 130.
Burgess, C., Livesay, K. y Lund, K. (1998).
Explorations in context space: words,
sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes,
, 211−257.
Burgess,C. y Lund,K. (2000). The dynamics of
meaning in memory.EnE.DietrichyB. Arthur
(Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and
representational change in humans and
machines (pp. 117–156). Mahwah,
NJ:Erlbaum.
Chaiken, S. y Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and
attitude change. Annual Review of
Psychology, 38, 575-630.
Comsky, N. (1983). A propósito de las estructuras
cognitivas y su desarrollo: Una respuesta a
Piaget. En M. Piatelli Palmarini (Comp.)
Teorías del Lenguaje. Teorías del
Aprendizaje. Barcelona : Crítica.
Collins, A. M. y Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
Cruz, M. G., Boster, F. J., y Rodriguez, J. I. (1997).
The impact of group size and proportion of
shared information on the exchange and
representational change in humans and
integration of information in groups.
Communication Research, 24, 291-313.
Doise, W. y Moscovici, S. (1984) Las decisiones
en grupo. En S. Moscovici (comp.) Psychologie Sociale. Paris: PUF.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social
comparison processes. Human Relations,
,114-140.
Fodor, J. (1985). La modularidad de la mente.
Madrid: Morata
Freeman L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social
Networks: Conceptual clarification. Social
Networks1, 215-239.
Gigone, D., y Hastie, R. (1997). The impact of
information on small group choice. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,
-140.
Gouran, D.S. y Hirokawa, R.Y. (1983). The role of
communication in decision-making groups:
A functional perspective. En M.S. Mander
(Ed.) Communications in transition. NY:
Preager.Gouran, D.S., Hirokawa, R.Y.,
Julian, K.M. y Leatham, G.B. (1993). The
evolution and current status of the functional
perspective on communication in decisionmaking
and problem-solving groups: A
critical analysis. En S. Deetz (Ed.)
Communication year book 16. CA: Sage.
Gouran, D. S. y Hirokawa, R. Y. (1996).
Functional Theory and Communication in
Decision-Making and Problem-Solving
Groups: An Expanded View. En Hirokawa y
Poole (Eds.) Communication and Group
Decision Making. Thousand Oaks. CA:
Sage. Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and
Instruction: Theory into practice. N.J.:
Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Gruenfeld, D. Thomas-Hunt, M., y Kim, P. (1998).
Cognitive flexibility, communication
strategy, and integrative complexity in
groups: Public versus private reactions to
majority and minority status. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 34,202-
Hebb, D. O. (1949).The organization of
behavior.New York: Wiley.
Hirokawa, R. (1983). Group Communication and
problem-solving effectiveness: An
investigation of group phases. Human
Communication Research, 9, 291-305.
Hirokawa, R. (1985). Discussion procedures and
decision-making performance.A test of a
f u n c t i o n a l p e r s p e c t i v e . H u m a n
Communication Research, 12,203-224.
Hirokawa, R. y Poole, M. (1996) Communication
and Group Decision Making. CA: Sage.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). The rank order
effect in group decision making.
Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 68:3, 181-193.
Hubert, L.J. y Schultz, J. (1976).Quadratic Assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 29, 190-241.
Jarboe, S. (1988).A comparison of In-Output,
process-out, and input-process-output
models of small group problem-solving
effectiveness.Communication Monographs,
,121-142.
Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical Clustering
Schemes.Psychometrika, 2:241-254.
Kameda, T. (1994). Groupdecision
making and social sharedness.
JapanesePsychological Review, 37,367-385.
Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y. y Takezawa, M. (1997).
Centrality in Sociocognitive Networks and
Social Influence.An Illustration in a Group
Decision-Making Context.Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology.
(2)296-309
Kameda, T., Takigiku, K. y Ohtsubo, Y. (1994,
November).Group decision making and the
sharing of cognitive representations:
Common knowledge effects revisited in
non- multiattribute task setting. (Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the
Society for Judgment and Decision Making,
St. Louis, MO)
King, P. M. y K. S. Kitchener. (1994). Developing
Reflective Judgment: Understanding and
Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical
Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Larson Jr., J. R. y Christensen, C. (1993). Groups
as problem-solving units: Toward a new
meaning of social cognition. British Journal
of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
Larson, J. R., Jr., Christensen, C., Franz, T. M., y
Abbott, A. S. (1998). Diagnosing groups:
The pooling, management, and impact of
shared and unshared case information in
decision making.Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 75, 93-108.
Laughlin, P.R. (1980) Social combination
processes of cooperative problem-solving
groups on verbal intellective tasks. En M.
Fishbein (ed.), Progress in social
psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
Laughlin, P.R. y Ellis, A. (1986). Demonstrability
and social combination processes on
intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 22,177-189.Laughlin,
P.R., Kerr, N.L., Davis, J.H., Haljaff, H.M. y
Marciniak, K.A. (1975). Group size,
member ability, and social decision schemes
on an intellective task.Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 31, 522-535.
Landauer, T.K. y Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution
to Plato‟s problem: the latent semantic
analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and
representation of knowledge. Psychological
Review, 104, 211−240.
López Alonso, A. O. (2000) Los diversos
significados inferenciales de las representaciones del imaginario social.
Interdisciplinaria. Vol. 17 (1): 39-59.
Lund, K., Burgess, C. y Atchley, R.A. (1995).
Semantic and associative priming in highdimensional
semantic space.Proceedings of
the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 660-665).
Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Publishers.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and
Performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall
McClelland, J. L. y Rumelhart, D. E. (1985).Distributed memory and the
representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159–188.
Mc Namara, T. P. y Holbrook, J. B. (2003).
Semantic Memory and Priming. En I. B.
Weiner (Ed.). Handbook of Psychology, Vol.
, 16, 447-474.
McRae, K. y Boisvert, S. (1988). Automatic
Semantic Similarity Priming.Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory and Cognition, 24, 3, 558-572.
Mennecke, B.E. (1997) An Experimental
Examination of the Influence of Varying
Group Sizes and Meeting Structures on
Information Sharing. The Internartional
Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47 (3),
-278.
Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., Acín, C., Prieto, F. y
Peiró, J. M. (1996). Análisis de la Interacción
Grupal a través de medidas de observación
en comunicación mediada. Revista de
Psicología Social, 11 (2) 129-256.
Parks, C. D. y Cowlin, R. A. (1996).Acceptance of
uncommon information into group
discussion when that information is or is not
demonstrable.Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 66,307-315.
Peiró, J.M., Prieto, M. y Zornoza, A.M. (1993).
Nuevas tecnologías telemáticas y trabajo
grupal. Una perspectiva psicosocial.
Psicothema, 5, 287 – 305.
Piaget, J. (1978) La equilibración de las
estructuras cognoscitivas. México, Siglo
XXI. Plaut, D. C. (1995).Semantic and
associative priming in a distributed attractor
network.Proceedings of the 17th Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 37- 42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Poole, M.S. y Hirokawa, R.Y. (1986).
Communication and group decisionmaking:
A critical assessment. En R.Y.
Hirokawa y M. S. Poole (Eds.)
Communication and Group Decision
Making.(1st. ed.). pp. 3-18. Beverly Hills.
CA: Sage.
Propp, K. M. (1997). Information utilization in
small group decision making: A study of the
evaluative interaction model. Small Group
Research, 28, 424-453
Ratcliff, R. y McKoon, G. (1981). Does activation
really spread? Psychological Review,
,454–462.
Ratcliff, R. yMcKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval
theory of priming in memory.
Psychological Review, 95, 385–408.
Rice, R.E. (1993). Using Networks Concepts to
Clarify Sources and Mechanisms of Social
Influence. En W. Richards, Jr. y G. Barnett
(Eds.) Progress in Communication Sciences,
vol. 12.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles
of neurodynamics. New York: Spartan.
Roselli, N. D. (1999) La construcción
sociocognitiva entre iguales: fundamentos
psicológicos del aprendizaje cooperativo.
Rosario: IRICERoselli, N., Bruno, M. y
Evangelista, L. (2004) El trabajo cognitivo
en equipo en forma presencial y mediada
tipo chat en grupos de cuatro sujetos. Revista
de Psicología General y Aplicada, 57, 1.
Rumelhart, D. y McClelland, J. L. (1986).Parallel
distributed processing: Explorations in the
microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1.
Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H.A. (1978). Information Processing
Theory of human problem solving. En W.
Estes (Ed.) Handbook of learning and
cognitive processes. Vol. 5: Human
Information Processing. Hilsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, E. E. (1978). Theories of semantic memory.
En W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning
and cognitive processes: Vol. 4.
Thompson, L., Peterson, E. y Brodt, S. (1996).
Team Negotiation: An examination of
intergrative and distributive bargaining.
Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 70, 66-78.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic
memory.En E. Tulving y W. Donaldson
(Eds.), Organization of memory (pp.
–403). New York: Academic Press.
Stasser, G. (1992). Information salience and the
discovery of hidden profiles by decisionmaking
groups: A "thought experiment.
Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 52, 156-181.
Stasser, G. y Dietz-Uhler, B. (2001). Collective
choice, judgment and problem solving.En
M. A. Hogg y S. Tindale (Eds.).Blackwell
handbook of social psychology: Group
processes pp. 31-55. Oxford, U K :
Blackwell.
Stasser, G. y Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of
hidden profiles by decision-making groups:
Solving a problem versus making a
judgment. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 63, 426-434.
Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D. y Wittenbaum, G. M.
(1995). Expert roles and information
exchange during discussion: The importance
of knowing who knows what. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology,31, 244-
Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A. y Hanna, C. (1989).
Information sampling in structured and
unstructured discussions of three- and sixperson
groups.Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
Stasser, G. y Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared
information in group decision making:
Biased information sampling during
discussion.Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
Stasser, G. y Titus, W. (1987). Effects of
information load and percentage of shared
information on the dissemination of
unshared information during group
discussion. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 53, 81-93.
Thompson, L. (1990). An examination of naive
and experienced negotiators.Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 82-
Thompson, L., Peterson, E. y Brodt, S. (1996).
Team Negotiation: An examination of
intergrative and distributive bargaining.
Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 70, 66-78.
Vilanova,A. (1997) Las deudas de la Psicología
del Cono Sur. Acta psiquiátrica y psicológica
de América Latina, 43,2, 103- 111
Vivas, J. (2004). Método Distsem: procedimiento
para la evaluación de distancias semánticas.
Revista Perspectivas en Psicología, 1 (1), 56-
Vivas, J. y Terroni, N. (2003). Formación de
consensos y significados en pequeños
grupos. La noción de centralidad
sociocognitiva. Revista Irice, 17: 127-140.
Vivas, J., Ricci, L. y Terroni, N. (2003).
Centralidad Sociocognitiva e Influencia
Social en la construcción de consensos.
Conocimiento compartido modulado por el
el canal de comunicación. Interdisciplinaria.
Vol. 20 (2): 147-171.
Vivas, J y Ricci, L. (2006) Matriz de creencias compartidas y
centralidad sociocognitivo en toma de
decisión modulada por el canal. Psic: Revista
da Vetor Editora, 7 (2).01-10.
Vivas, J. (2007). Análisis de redes semánticas
aplicado a contenidos académicos. Métodos
e instrumentos. En Kronmüller, E. y Cornejo,
C. (Comp.). Ciencias de la Mente:
Aproximaciones desde Latinoamérica.
Santiago, Chile: JCSáez Editor. 385-409.
Vivas, J., Huapaya, C., Lizarralde, F., Arona, G.,
Comesaña, A, Vivas, L., García Coni, A.
(2008). Distsem e Infosem: Instrumentos
para la evaluación de la Memoria Semántica.
Método y aplicaciones. En M. Concepción
Rodriguez y V. Padilla Montemayor (Comp.)
Cognición y memoria, sus representaciones
y mediciones. Monterrey: Ed. Universidad
Autónoma de Nuevo León.
Wasserman, S. y Faust, K. (1998).Social Network
Analysis. Methods and Applications.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T. y Hertel, P. T. (1985).
Cognitive interdependence in close
relationships. En W. J. Ickes
(Ed.).Compatible and incompatible
relationships pp. 253-276. New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Weldon, M. S. y Bellinger, K. D. (1997).
Collective memory: Collaborative and
individual processes in remembering.
Journal of experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160-
Wittenbaum, G. M. (1998). Information sampling
in decision-making groups: The impact of
members‟ task-relevant status. Small Group
Research, 29, 57-84.
Wittenbaum, G. M. y Stasser, G. (1996).
Management of information in small
group. En J. L. Nye y A. M. Brower (Eds.),
What´s social about social cognition?
Research on socially shared cognition in
small groups. Thousand Oaks: SagePublications.
Yetton, P. y Bottger, P. (1983). The relationships
among group size, member ability, social
decision schemes, and performance.
OrganizationalBehavoir and Human
Performance, 32, 145-159.
Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., Salanova, M., Peiro, J. M.
y Prieto, F. (1993) Procesos de status,
liderazgo e influencia en la comunicación
mediada. En L. Munduate Jaca y M. Barón
Duque (comp.) Psicología del trabajo y de las
organizaciones. Sevilla: Eudema. Zwaan, R.
A., Langston, M. C. y Graesser, A. C. (1995).
The construction of situation models in
narrative comprehension: An event-indexing
model. Psychological Science 6 (5): 292-297
Zwaan, R. A., y G. A. Radvansky. (1998) Situation
models in language comprehension and
memory. Psychological Bulletin 123 (2):
-185.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
